Babri Masjid:History of Ayodhya Temple Masjid Dispute

Babri Masjid:History of Ayodhya Temple Masjid Dispute:For decades, the Ayodhya dispute revolves around claims to land in Ayodhya, which is considered to be frightened by the Indians, as it is considered the birthplace of Lord Rama, while Muslims are seeking to protect the Babri Masji site.
Hindus believe that Ayodhya is the birthplace of Lord Rama, an avatar of Vishnu. Earth, therefore, are considered holy and fitting the profile of the holy place of pilgrimage.

Communal tensions on the ground rooted in the construction of the Babri Masji, Muslim emperor Babur, who in 1527 defeated the Hindu king of Chittorgarh, Rana Sangram Singh of Fatehpur Sikri.
The king has left the general, “World” Banks, as the Viceroy of the region. The World Banks that forced the Mughal rule over the population, came to Ayodhya in 1528 and built a mosque.
There are claims that when the mosque was built, Ram temple in Ayodhya was either destroyed or modified to a considerable extent.
For many years, the Indians tried to return the “Ram Janmabhoomi” while Muslims were trying to protect the Babri Masjid.
Growth of disputes over the years
According to the literature, ranging from 1987 to 1940 the mosque was called Masjid-I Janmasthan (“mosque of the homeland”), Indian Muslims
1947 – The ruling government banned Muslims from them about the site (at least 200 yards). The main gate was locked. However, the Hindu pilgrims were allowed to enter through a side door.

1984 :

Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) has launched a campaign to return the site to the Hindus, so that a temple dedicated to infant Ram (Ramlala) can be installed.

1989 :

The Allahabad High Court took to the main gate should be opened up and restored the site to Hindus for eternity.

But communal strife again broke out when the Indians intented to make changes in the structure of the Islamic architectural style of the General World Banking.
When they opened the proposed new grand temple with the permission of government, riots erupted in India, as the Muslim community was against it.
This is when the government moved the court, referring to the south of the dispute before the court
1992 :

The dispute took a rather ugly turn on 6 December 1992, when the Babri Masjid was destroyed during a political rally. This led to riots in which over 2000 were killed.

Ten days after the destruction of Babri Masjid, the commission Liberhan was created to investigate the circumstances that led to the demolition.

2003 :

On the order of the High Court, Archaeological Survey of India carried out excavations at the disputed site of Rama Janmabhumi – Babri Masjid on 12 March 2003 to August 7, 2003. Studies have reportedly found evidence of an ancient temple.

574-page report, with maps, drawings, and the views were presented to Lucknow Bench of Allahabad High Court in August 2003.
Based on archaeological evidence ASI report said that the remains had been found features associated with the temples of north India and said that there was sufficient evidence for the existence of massive and monumental structure with a minimum size of 50×30 meters from north to south and east-west directions respectively just below the disputed structure .
2005 :

July 5, 2005, five terrorists attacked the site of a temporary temple Ramlalla, in Ayodhya.

All five terrorists were killed during a firefight with the Central Reserve Police (CRPF), security zones. Attack claimed the life one civilian, who died in a grenade explosion that terrorists have caused violations of the cordon wall.
2009 :

In November 2009, some of the commission’s findings Liberhan leaked to the media. These reports leaked accused the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leaders such as LK Advani and Murli Manohar Joshi.

Read: Vajpayee, Advani, accused in the Babri demolition
2010:

Sep 24, 2010, Allahabad High Court was scheduled to give his verdict on the Ayodhya title suit on the ownership of the disputed land. On the eve of the court, the Supreme Court deferred the verdict of the week for a deferment request and scheduled a hearing request to postpone Tuesday, September 28.

SC stays Ayodhya verdict; hear the call deferment on September 28
Some important notes / books to India’s independence:
Back in 1767, Joseph Tieffenthaler, a Jesuit priest, recorded in his French works, which were worshiped by Hindus and celebration Ramanavami mosque on the site. In 1788 he recorded that Emperor Aurangzeb destroyed the fortress called Ramkot establish a Muslim temple.
Even before the 19 th century, books were Hindus worship Ram on a hill Ramkot.
P Carnegie wrote in his “Historical Sketch of Faizabad Tehsil, 1870,” He said that until this time (referring to Hindu-Muslim clashes in 1850), Hindus and Mohamedans so used to worship at a mosque temple.
“Since the British rule railing was put up to prevent dispute, within which, in the mosque to pray Mohamedans, and the fence Indians raised platform on which they make their offer.”
When passing the order on the issue in March 1886 Faizabad district judge, Col. FEA Chamier, said:
“I visited the land in dispute yesterday in the presence of all parties. I found that the Masjid was built by Emperor Babar stands on the border of Ayodhya, that is, to the west and south it is away from home. This is the most Unfortunately, the Masjid should be constructed on land specially sacred Hindu, but as this event occurred 356 years ago, it’s too late to agree with the complaints. “…